Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MEACCI, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Contributions to Political Economy, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 21-37, 1998

research-article

FURTHER REFLECTIONS ON THE MACHINERY QUESTION

FERDINANDO MEACCI

Università di Padova

Abstract

This paper re-examines Ricardo's argument on machinery in the light of Samuelson's recent attempt to add new force to the long stream of its interpretations. This attempt is partly criticised and partly re-utilised to produce a new reconstruction of that argument. This reconstruction is carried out by disentangling the long-run effects of inventions from the short-run effects of the conversion of circulating into fixed capital; and by arguing that both Ricardo II (the author of the machinery chapter) and Ricardo I (the author of the ‘previous opinion’) are right. The paper also argues that the phenomena of technological unemployment and of changes in technical coefficients, however implicit, do not constitute the core of Ricardo's argument. These conclusions are reached on the basis of the theoretical implications of the classical distinctions between value and wealth, and between free capital (wages fund) and invested capital.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.