Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pitelis, C. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Con Pec 2002; 21:9-26
© 2002 Cambridge Political Economy Society


Article

Stephen Hymer: Life and the Political Economy of Multinational Corporate Capital

Christos N. Pitelis

Judge Institute of Management and Queens' College, University of Cambridge, UK and Center for Financial Studies, Athens, Greece

Abstract

This paper provides a short account of Stephen Hymer's life and (its link to) his contribution to the theory of the multinational enterprise (MNE), but mainly the political economy of multinational corporate capital. It suggests that as concerns the theory of the MNE, Hymer's contribution has in effect predated most current extant theory. His contribution to the political economy of multinational capital, the focus here, is less known, yet of extraordinary insight and foresight. Hymer predates most important debates on what today is called ‘globalisation’ and came up with analysis of the highest quality and predictions which in the main have stood the test of time. The chief limitation in Hymer's work stems from a tendency to emphasise the monopoly attributes of large MNEs, and the inefficiency and inequity of ‘multinational corporate capital’. In part because of this tendency, some of his later work involved predictions that did not necessarily and/or fully follow from his analytical framework, were shaped by ‘ideology’ and were of varying agrees of accuracy. Despite limitations, Hymer's overall contribution and impact fully deserves the almost ‘cult’ status he has acquired in the history of economic thought and international business scholarship.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Contrib Pol EconomyHome page
K. Cowling and P. R. Tomlinson
GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE POWER
Contrib. Pol. Economy, August 1, 2005; 24(1): 33 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Contrib Pol EconomyHome page
C. Kottaridi
FDI, GROWTH AND THE ROLE OF GOVERNANCE: CHANGING THE RULES OF THE GAME
Contrib. Pol. Economy, August 1, 2005; 24(1): 79 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.