Skip Navigation


Contributions to Political Economy Advance Access originally published online on April 2, 2009
Contributions to Political Economy 2009 28(1):71-91; doi:10.1093/cpe/bzp001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/1/71    most recent
bzp001v2
bzp001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramirez, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved

Marx's Theory of Ground Rent: A Critical Assessment

Miguel D. Ramirez*

Department of Economics, Trinity College, Hartford, USA

This critical essay provides the reader with an up-to-date assessment of Marx's relatively neglected theory of absolute ground rent by bringing together in a coherent manner his scattered observations and arguments contained primarily in Capital, Vol. III and Theories of Surplus Value, Vol. II. It also reviews the extant secondary literature which suggests that within Marx's theory of rent is an embryonic theory of monopoly from which scholars can draw important insights into the history of economic thought and the workings of mature capitalism. The paper is organized as follows. After an introductory section, Section II provides the reader with an overview of Marx's theory of differential rent and compares it to that of Ricardo, particularly Marx's discussion of differential rent II and whether nature is productive of exchange value. Section III discusses Marx's theory of absolute rent in light of recent criticisms by prominent scholars and suggests that what determines whether rent is paid on the marginal land is not technical backwardness or lower productivity of labor per se, but a social relation, viz., the monopoly created by the private ownership of land. The last section summarizes the main arguments and suggests some avenues for future research.


* Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, USA. The author wishes to express his thanks to the editors of this journal and to two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions for improvement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.